How to get touch with us over the festive period

Our offices will be closed on 25 and 26 December, and 1 January with no access via telephone or email on these days. On 23, 24 and 27 December you will be able to reach us via telephone, email and our live chat but our offices will be closed to the public. All other dates we are open as usual. 

Complete the form below to ask us a question or make an enquiry. We’ll get back to you via phone or email as soon as possible.

Insights

Revoking Wills and Tearing up the Clarity of the 200-Year-Old Legislation

Posted on 18th November 2024 in Dispute Resolution

Posted by

Martin Laver

Partner and Solicitor
Revoking Wills and Tearing up the Clarity of the 200-Year-Old Legislation

How can you revoke a will?

Revocation of a will is heavily constrained by the Wills Act 1837.

Section 20 of this act stipulates how a Will can be revoked and prescribes an exhaustive list of the methods for revoking a will. The Wills Act emphasises the preference for revocation to be made in writing yet it is recognised that parties may not always do this and prescribes revocation by some other means, including through the destruction of the will document.

This destruction includes “by the burning, tearing, or otherwise destroying the same by the testator, or by some person in his presence and by his direction, with the intention of revoking the same”.

The case of Carry Keats’ estate

This revocation by destruction is central to the recent case of Carry Keats’ Estate, reported in The Times recently, which prompted a need for clarity of this 200-year-old legislation. The case concerns her £800,000 estate and how this is to be distributed after the 92-year-old tore three-quarters of the way through her will on her deathbed.

If the will is still valid then her estate will be distributed between her five cousins. If tearing three quarters of the way through her will is a valid revocation, she will have died intestate and her estate will be entirely left to her sister. The crucial question is whether tearing three-quarters of the will is enough.

The arguments in favour of the validity of the will centre around:

  1. the action of destruction being incomplete, as the tear was only three-quarters of the way through the will
  2. the fact that Mrs Keats was heavily medicated and in pain at the time she tore the will and
  3. whether Mrs Keats had legal capacity to revoke the will.

However, the opposing position is that Mrs Keats supposedly knew what she was doing and was intending to cut the cousins out of the will, especially given the recent rift between her and them.

Much of the determination the case will rely on the judgment that is yet to be delivered, which should, at the same time, bring clarity as to the interpretation of this 200-year-old legislation.

Whilst there has been no judgment delivered yet, there are likely to be repercussions whichever way the Court decides the case.

Comment

Martin Laver, head of the Disputed Wills and Trusts Team comments “This case highlights two important points; firstly, it is imperative to maintain and update your will provisions in the event that your circumstances change. Secondly, if you do wish to revoke your will, but do not want to make a new one, it is sensible to record that fact in writing if at all possible.” 

Whilst the facts of this case may not arise very often, issues of revocation are more common than you might imagine and can lead to disputes amongst the family as well as legal costs in resolving the issues. 

How we can help

We are experts in dispute resolution and we can help you navigate disputes of this sort. We understand it can be difficult and stressful to try to understand complicated technicalities, especially when at the heart of disputes like these concerns a bereavement that, by its nature, can be an emotional and sensitive matter. 

Contact our legal experts

Company & Industry

Related Insights

Insights

Who Inherits When There Is No Will? Understanding the Intestacy Rules

Posted on 02nd December 2024 in Dispute Resolution

The Intestacy Rules apply to both spouses and civil partners in the same way and they are top priority. However, where a marriage or civil partnership has been dissolved by a legally recognised decree or there is ongoing judicial separation, the surviving spouse/civil partner is no longer entitled to inherit under the Intestacy Rules.

Posted by

Martin Laver

Partner and Solicitor
Insights

Police Force Issued with a £750,000 Penalty Notice by the ICO for an Unprecedented and Industrial Scale Data Breach

Posted on 09th October 2024 in Dispute Resolution, Data Protection

In a recent case involving the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) and the Chief Constable of Northern Ireland, the ICO issued a penalty notice due to non-compliance with UK GDPR obligations. The incident stemmed from a data breach that occurred during a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) response. While FOIA requests are typically limited to public authorities, the lessons from this case are relevant to all businesses handling personal data. Read our latest insight for a breakdown of the key points.

Posted by

Jessica Whittick

Solicitor