How to get touch with us over the festive period

Our offices will be closed on 25 and 26 December, and 1 January with no access via telephone or email on these days. On 23, 24 and 27 December you will be able to reach us via telephone, email and our live chat but our offices will be closed to the public. All other dates we are open as usual. 

Complete the form below to ask us a question or make an enquiry. We’ll get back to you via phone or email as soon as possible.

Insights

Minor children Inheritance Act claims

Posted on 11th February 2021 in Dispute Resolution

Posted by

Cory Stephenson

Solicitor
Minor children Inheritance Act claims

An important recent decision for minor applicants was made under IPFADA is Ubbi v Ubbi. The facts of this case are a fairly common set of circumstances, where the deceased has a child (or children) with one partner and then marries someone else and has subsequent children or step-children. In this case, the deceased was married and had a disabled child with his wife but went onto have an affair and subsequently two illegitimate children. The deceased left his £3.4m estate to his widow and disabled child.

 

Who can make an Inheritance Act claim?

There are many different types of claimants under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (IPFADA). Whilst every individual has different circumstances and therefore different prospects under the IPFADA, the common category of claimants are:

  1. Minor children
  2. Adult children
  3. Spouses
  4. Unmarried couples
  5. Individuals on low income

 

What could a minor child recieve through an Inheritance Act claim?

It is now fairly well established that a minor child can meet the threshold for reasonable financial provision under IPFADA – it is irrelevant whether the minor child is illegitimate or not. In this case, it was not in dispute that the applicants were entitled to reasonable financial provision. The question for the Court was to arrive at a suitable award with consideration to authorities and the relevant factors set out under section 3 of IPFADA.

In this case the Court awarded approximately £386,000 to the applicants. The Judge applied the Ogden table (a multiplier used to calculate awards in cases like this) and considered:

  1. Children’s housing need
  2. Childcare requirements
  3. Schooling costs
  4. The mother’s base income.

These are some of the factors the Court assess in order to calculate the child’s need for reasonable financial provision. These factors are the ‘need’ for financial. There must be a reason.

 

How can a minor child make an Inheritance Act claim?

Looking at Ubbi v Ubbi and the Ogden table above, these are our expert lawyers top tips for IPFADA for minor children.

  • A minor child applicant will require a litigation friend to conduct the claim and instruct a Solicitor. This is usually a parent or guardian.
  • A minor child will usually have strong prospects of meeting the threshold for reasonable provision under IPFADA.
  • Ensure that your Will is kept up to date to avoid disappointed children and costly litigation.

 

Find out more

For further advice and guidance on claiming under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 please contact our team of expert lawyers.

Contact our legal experts

 

Company & Industry

Related Insights

Insights

Who Inherits When There Is No Will? Understanding the Intestacy Rules

Posted on 02nd December 2024 in Dispute Resolution

The Intestacy Rules apply to both spouses and civil partners in the same way and they are top priority. However, where a marriage or civil partnership has been dissolved by a legally recognised decree or there is ongoing judicial separation, the surviving spouse/civil partner is no longer entitled to inherit under the Intestacy Rules.

Posted by

Martin Laver

Partner and Solicitor
Insights

Police Force Issued with a £750,000 Penalty Notice by the ICO for an Unprecedented and Industrial Scale Data Breach

Posted on 09th October 2024 in Dispute Resolution, Data Protection

In a recent case involving the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) and the Chief Constable of Northern Ireland, the ICO issued a penalty notice due to non-compliance with UK GDPR obligations. The incident stemmed from a data breach that occurred during a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) response. While FOIA requests are typically limited to public authorities, the lessons from this case are relevant to all businesses handling personal data. Read our latest insight for a breakdown of the key points.

Posted by

Jessica Whittick

Solicitor