Complete the form below to ask us a question or make an enquiry. We’ll get back to you via phone or email as soon as possible.

Insights

Inheritance Act claims for children of the family

Posted on 27th October 2022 in Dispute Resolution

Posted by

Abigail Francis

Paralegal
Inheritance Act claims for children of the family

I am not the deceased’s biological child, am I entitled to bring a claim?

The Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 provides a right to any individual treated as a ‘child of the family’ to bring a claim under the deceased’s estate.

 

Am I considered to be a ‘child of the family’?

A child of the family is essentially a non-biological child of the deceased. The most obvious applicant in this category would be a stepchild of the deceased, related by marriage or partnership only.

In practice, a ‘child of the family’ extends to both minor and adult children. In order to establish that you are a child of the family, you must evidence that the deceased assumed the position of a parent and treated you in a way that they would have done if you were their biological child. There is no need for formalities such as adoption and instead, all that is necessary is to evidence the nature of your relationship with the deceased.

 

What am I entitled to claim as a ‘child of the family’?

A child of the family is entitled to claim for standard financial provision under the Act. Such provision extends to what is reasonable in all the circumstances for your maintenance.

Although there is no clear definition of ‘maintenance’, the Court tends to reach a middle ground by awarding beyond mere necessities without extending to luxuries one might ought to have.

 

What is ‘reasonable financial provision’?

To assess what is ‘reasonable financial provision’ for the applicant, the Court must consider various circumstances, including:

  • The financial need and/or resources of the applicant now and in the future;
  • The financial needs and/or resources of any other potential applicant now and in the future;
  • The financial needs and/or resources of any beneficiary of the estate now and in the future;
  • Any obligations and responsibilities which the deceased had towards the claimant, applicant or beneficiary;
  • The size and nature of the estate;
  • Any physical or mental disability of the claimant, applicant or any beneficiary; and
  • Any other matter the court considers relevant.

 

Is there a time limit for bringing this type of claim?

It is important to note that there is a limitation period of six months for these types of claims, triggered by the issue of a grant of probate. For this reason, it is important to act promptly when considering whether to bring a claim.

Relevant court proceedings should be issued within six months from the date of the grant of probate.

 

Find out more

If you think you may be eligible to bring a claim under the Inheritance Act, contact our specialists online or on 01392 207 020.

Contact our legal experts

Company & Industry

Related Insights

Insights

Police Force Issued with a £750,000 Penalty Notice by the ICO for an Unprecedented and Industrial Scale Data Breach

Posted on 09th October 2024 in Dispute Resolution, Data Protection

In a recent case involving the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) and the Chief Constable of Northern Ireland, the ICO issued a penalty notice due to non-compliance with UK GDPR obligations. The incident stemmed from a data breach that occurred during a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) response. While FOIA requests are typically limited to public authorities, the lessons from this case are relevant to all businesses handling personal data. Read our latest insight for a breakdown of the key points.

Posted by

Jessica Whittick

Solicitor
Insights

Contesting a Will: Lack of Capacity

Posted on 30th September 2024 in Dispute Resolution

When a person executes a will they must have the mental capacity to do so. Where a will appears rational and has been duly executed, it is presumed that the testator had capacity unless somebody provides evidence to rebut this.

Posted by

Abigail Francis

Paralegal