Complete the form below to ask us a question or make an enquiry. We’ll get back to you via phone or email as soon as possible.

Insights

How to challenge a registered trade mark

Posted on 27th January 2020 in Intellectual Property

Posted by

Jill Headford

Partner and Solicitor
How to challenge a registered trade mark

Trade mark registrations are not immune to challenge. Missing the opportunity to oppose an application for a trade mark before it is registered does not mean it is too late to take action. Even after registration it can still be possible to cancel or have a registered trade mark declared invalid. The person challenging the trade mark does not always need to own a similar registered trade mark themselves.

When would a business need to challenge a trade mark?

Often businesses become aware of the problem in the following situations:

  • They are about to apply for a registered trade mark in a brand name that has been used for many years without registration but when searching the trade mark register discover that someone else has already registered the name.
  • They apply for a registered trade mark but omit to conduct a thorough search for similar trade marks before applying. The first they learn of the already registered trademark is a letter from the Intellectual Property Office trademark examiner stating that if their application proceeds, the examiner will write to the owner of a prior registered trademark inviting them to oppose the application.
  • They have a registered trade mark but for some reason (such as failing to update their address for service on the register) identify a trademark in their brand name which somehow managed to be registered. There is no rule against concurrent registration.

In all of the above situations, it is too late to use the fast-track opposition procedure because the trademark is already registered.

How can registered trade marks be canceled?

Obtaining trade mark registration does not guarantee that it will remain on the register. Any trademark is vulnerable to proceedings before the Intellectual Property Office tribunal which could result in it being removed from the register. There are several grounds for an application but most often these are relied on by the party seeking to challenge:

  • the name or logo is insufficiently distinctive or unclear, for example, it describes the product or relates to a geographic location
  • there is a prior registered trade mark in the same or similar name or logo
  • the challenger owns unregistered rights such as copyright or passing off in the name or logo that existed before the trade mark was applied for.
  • the trade mark was applied for in bad faith – for example in brand hijacking situations such as taking control of someone else’s Amazon listing
  • the trade mark has not been used

Find out more

If you would like any help or support then visit our dedicated Intellectual Property pages or contact our expert team.

Contact our legal experts

Company & Industry

Related Insights

Insights

How Can I Register a Trade Mark for My Charity?

Posted on 18th February 2025 in Intellectual Property, Charities and Social Enterprise

Thoughtful registration of intellectual property lies at the heart of many a charitable success and we can advise about how to maximise the protection available to you. Even if trade mark registration has been completely overlooked, there are different ways forward. We can provide specialist advice to get the application right and avoid conflicts, saving you time and funds.

Posted by

Jessica Whittick

Solicitor
Insights

Betrayal and Branding: Intellectual Property Insights from The Traitors

Posted on 03rd February 2025 in Intellectual Property

The recent finale of the BBC's hit show The Traitors has captivated audiences, becoming the most viewed final in the show's history. It first appeared on BBC One in November 2022 and is based on the TV show De Verraders (‘The Traitors’ in Dutch). As viewers were glued to their screens, witnessing the dramatic twists and turns, it also provided a unique opportunity to reflect on the broader implications of the show’s intellectual property (IP).

Posted by

Jessica Whittick

Solicitor