Complete the form below to ask us a question or make an enquiry. We’ll get back to you via phone or email as soon as possible.

Insights

American Express fined by the ICO for marketing emails sent without valid consent

Posted on 21st May 2021 in Intellectual Property

Posted by

Jill Headford

Partner and Solicitor
American Express fined by the ICO for marketing emails sent without valid consent

The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has fined American Express £90,000 for sending over 4 million unsolicited marketing emails between 1 June 2018 and 21 May 2019 to existing customers without consent.

Many of these emails were messages purportedly providing customers with information about their account but they also promoted American Express products, encouraged customers to spend on their credit cards and download a mobile app. American Express had rejected customer complaints on the basis that these were ‘service messages’ that did not require consent.

The ICO disagreed and decided this was a serious breach of regulation 22 of the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/2426) (PECR) because of American Express’ failure to take reasonable steps to avoid the breach, which could have included consulting the ICO's guidance on direct marketing.

Amongst others, the emails were sent to customers who had opted out of marketing messages. The ICO held that the emails were marketing messages.

The ICO said, "Service messages contain routine information such as changes to terms and conditions and payment plans or notice of service interruptions. Direct marketing is defined as any communication of advertising or marketing material directed at particular individuals. It is against the law to send marketing emails to people unless consent has been freely given. This is contained in Regulation 22 of the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003."

The fine is a reminder to exercise some judgment before sending emails to customers who may not have also provided consent to receive marketing messages. Do not assume that it is acceptable to disguise a marketing email as a ‘service message’ (for example an update about their account or the service which is really a promotion). These emails are still a breach of the rules if sent without the recipients’ valid consent. What matters is the content rather than the label the sender gives it.

Find out more

If you would like any help or support with trade marks, including dealing with oppositions to an application then visit our dedicated Intellectual Property pages or contact our expert team.

Contact our legal experts

Company & Industry

Related Insights

Insights

Betrayal and Branding: Intellectual Property Insights from The Traitors

Posted on 03rd February 2025 in Intellectual Property

The recent finale of the BBC's hit show The Traitors has captivated audiences, becoming the most viewed final in the show's history. It first appeared on BBC One in November 2022 and is based on the TV show De Verraders (‘The Traitors’ in Dutch). As viewers were glued to their screens, witnessing the dramatic twists and turns, it also provided a unique opportunity to reflect on the broader implications of the show’s intellectual property (IP).

Posted by

Jessica Whittick

Solicitor
Insights

What Can Jeremy Clarkson’s Trade Mark Applications Tell Us About His Future Plans?

Posted on 23rd September 2024 in Intellectual Property

The Farmer’s Dog is the name of Jeremy Clarkson’s ‘Proper British Pub’ in Burford, located just a few miles from Diddly Squat Farm.

Posted by

Jessica Whittick

Solicitor